Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39902606›Full record

ReviewSociology of health & illness2025

Cancer Survivorship and the Significance of an Integrated Diachronic Life Course Perspective.

Matthew Tieu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sociology of health & illness, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Matthew TieuCollege of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3578-6579

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Standardised health care is primarily focused on remediation and delivered episodically through costly and fragmented health-care systems. Such an approach is untenable, given the diversity and complexity of peoples' health-care needs, increasing prevalence of chronic disease and existing heath inequities. A life course perspective fundamentally challenges our current understanding of health care and has great potential to promote innovation in health-care practice, systems and policy. However, the way that health develops and manifests across the life course is a highly complex process underpinned by a plethora of causal antecedents, consequences and interdependencies that have yet to be adequately captured and articulated in current life course frameworks. The field of cancer survivorship and its recent rise to prominence provides a highly relevant and compelling case example to inform development and refinement of existing life course frameworks. Cancer survivorship exemplifies what can be described as an integrated diachronic life course perspective, which serves as a conceptual framework to enhance our understanding of health development across the life course and guide health-care practice, systems and policy to meet the increasingly complex health-care needs of current and future generations.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsNeoplasmsSurvivorshipHumanscancer survivorshipholistic careintegrated carelife course theorypatient navigationshared care

Identifiers

PMID39902606
PMCPMC11791886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.