ArticleFuture oncology (London, England)2025
Treatment landscape and disease burden of patients with multiple myeloma in Japan: a real-world survey.
Article in Future oncology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Belantamab mafodotin, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for RRMM in the Japan expansion cohort of the phase 3 DREAMM-7 trial.International journal of hematology · 2026Trial
- Belantamab mafodotin, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone in Japanese patients with RRMM in the phase 3 DREAMM-8 trial.International journal of hematology · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimMultiple myeloma (MM) is a hematological malignancy associated with poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Safe and effective treatments for MM are limited. There is a need for real-world data to improve understanding of treatment patterns and sequencing in routine clinical practice in Japan. This study evaluated disease burden, treatment patterns, treatment sequencing, and reasons for treatment selection in patients with MM in Japan.
methodsThis analysis used survey data of hematologists or hemato-oncologists and their adult patients with MM who received active treatment in a real-world setting in Japan between September 2022 and May 2023. Treatment and retreatment patterns and data from several validated patient reported outcome tools were analyzed. Formal sample size calculations were not applicable.
resultsFifty-one physicians provided data for 309 patients, of whom 52 completed a quality-of-life survey (median [interquartile range] overall health status by EQ-5D-3L questionnaire: 0.7 [0.6-1.0]). Of 309 patients, most (77%) of the first-line cohort received a lenalidomide-based therapy. Lenalidomide retreatment was common in patients with relapsed/refractory MM (80%).
conclusionPoor HRQoL and high retreatment rates indicate a need for new therapy options in patients with MM in Japan. These findings may guide healthcare policies and clinical practice in Japan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.