ReviewJournal of maxillofacial and oral surgery2025
Role of ALT Perforator Flaps in Head and Neck Reconstruction.
Review in Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Functional tongue reconstruction using innervated TDAP versus ALT free flaps: a retrospective paired-cohort study.Head & face medicine · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The anterolateral thigh flap is a versatile flap that offers many advantages. These include a long and reliable pedicle that enables a wide arc of rotation, the possibility to harvest a large skin area, raising the flap with underlying fascia and minimal donor site morbidity. The purpose of this study is to show better esthetics and function with the use of ALT perforator flap in head and neck region. It is a large prospective case study done in our institute with regular follow-up which shows the outcomes of ALT flap. Materials and Method: From 2020 to 2022, hundred patients were reconstructed with anterolateral thigh flap. The flap was used for reconstruction in head and neck region. The patient group consisted of 53 males and 47 females. The age range was 30-90 years with a mean age of 61 years. Patients who had extensive soft tissue defect in the head and neck and had been reconstructed by free ALT flap have been reported. Flap data (type, length, and width), duration of flap elevation, donor-site morbidity, post-operative complications, and follow-up data including aesthetic and functional outcome were recorded. Results: We experienced no flap loss. The donor site was closed directly in twenty-eight out of eighty patients, and the remaining twenty patients were closed by split thickness skin grafting. Satisfactory aesthetic and functional outcome were achieved in all patients. Conclusion: Our experience illustrates the versatility in the clinical application of the anterolateral thigh flap. The many advantages of the flap, such as the long and reliable pedicle, a large area of skin that can be harvested, the potential to supercharge the flap and the minimal donor site morbidity, highlight the diversity of defects that can be reconstructed using this flap.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.