Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39902327›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2025

Optimizing

Valérie F Chamberland, Matthew-James Bennett, Tania Doblado Speck, Kelly R W Latijnhouwers, Margaret W Miller

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Valérie F Chamberland *SECORE International, Miami, Florida, United States.
Matthew-James Bennett *SECORE International, Miami, Florida, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2299-4582
Tania Doblado SpeckSECORE International, Miami, Florida, United States.
Kelly R W LatijnhouwersSECORE International, Miami, Florida, United States.
Margaret W MillerSECORE International, Miami, Florida, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0883-5064

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Larval propagation and seeding of scleractinian corals for restoration is a rapidly expanding field, with demonstrated applications to assist the recovery of declining populations on reefs. The process typically involves collecting coral reproductive material, facilitating Methods: In this study we tested three IVF conditions in four Caribbean broadcast-spawning coral species ( Results: These experiments revealed a gamete longevity of at least 4 h and clear minimum sperm concentration thresholds (>10 Discussion: We present these results in the context of IVF data available for other hermaphroditic broadcast-spawning scleractinians. We then provide recommendations for coral breeding practitioners to maximize larval production from gamete collections, and finally, we discuss our findings' potential implications on fertilization dynamics during natural coral spawning events.

Indexed as

AnthozoaFertilization in VitroAnimalsCaribbean RegionFemaleLarvaMaleSpermatozoaSperm CountAssisted fertilizationCoral breedingGamete ageGamete co-incubation periodReproductive biologyScleractinian coralsSperm concentration

Identifiers

PMID39902327
PMCPMC11789651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.