Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39902322›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2025

Nutrient cycling characteristics along a chronosequence of forest primary succession in the Hailuogou Glacier retreat area, eastern Tibetan Plateau.

Danli Yang, Ji Luo, Shumiao Shu, Yan Hu, Hongsong Tang, Xuemei Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Danli YangNeijiang Normal University, Neijiang, China.
Ji LuoInstitute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, China.
Shumiao ShuNeijiang Normal University, Neijiang, China.
Yan HuNeijiang Normal University, Neijiang, China.
Hongsong TangNeijiang Normal University, Neijiang, China.
Xuemei LiNeijiang Normal University, Neijiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Hailuogou Glacier has been continuously retreating since the end of the Little Ice Age, resulting in a 125-year soil chronosequence and a complete primary forest succession sequence. Nutrient cycling and utilization are the foundation to forest succession processes and dynamic changes, directly influencing the structure and stability of ecosystems. However, our understandings on the characteristics of ecosystem nutrient accumulation and recycling during succession, especially in the context of primary succession within glacier retreat areas, remain limited. To address this, we investigated nutrient characteristics across six forest primary succession sites in the Hailuogou Glacier retreat area. Methods: Six sites representing three forest stages: the pioneer plant stage (S1), the broad-leaved forest stage (S2-S4), and the coniferous forest stage (S5-S6). Three quadrats were established at each site, and measurements of biomass as well as soil characteristics were documented within each quadrat. Subsequently, we collected samples of vegetation, soil and litter. By measuring the concentrations of N, P, K, Ca, and Mg in vegetation and soil and combining with the data of the quadrat survey, the pools and nutrient characteristics of N, P, K, Ca, and Mg in various components of the ecosystem were calculated at each site. Results: Our findings indicated that: (1) Nutrient pools, excluding the soil C layer, increased with forest primary succession, reaching 5,995.71 kg hm

Indexed as

ForestsIce CoverNutrientsSoilBiomassEcosystemNitrogenPhosphorusTibetNitrogenNutrientsPhosphorusSoilGlacier retreat areaNutrient allocationNutrient cyclingPrimary succession

Identifiers

PMID39902322
PMCPMC11789653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.