ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2025
Comparison of skin-to-bone distance in the interscapular region when measured in the prone position and in the seated position in a therapy massage chair.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] To investigate whether the skin-to-bone distance at specific points in the interscapular region differs when measured in the prone and seated positions. [Participants and Methods] Eighteen healthy males (age, 22-63 years; height, 161.5-181.5 cm) were recruited. The skin-to-bone distance at Points A (fifth rib, near acupoint BL43) and B (eighth rib, near acupoint BL46) was measured using ultrasonography in the prone and seated positions. In the prone position, the participants laid on a bed with their shoulders abducted at 90°, and in the seated position, a commercial massage chair was used. [Results] The mean distance at Point A in the prone position was 2.7 ± 0.4 cm (range, 1.9-3.4 cm). The mean distance at Point B was lower than that at Point A in the prone and seated positions, with no significant difference in the distance between the two positions. [Conclusions] The skin-to-bone distance in the interscapular region did not differ significantly when measured in the seated and prone positions. Tissue components in some anatomical areas change with posture, whereas others do not. Further studies on posture-induced changes to tissue components are necessary to improve understanding of these variations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.