Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39902228›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2024

Anti-nuclear matrix protein 2 antibody-associated juvenile dermatomyositis with gastrointestinal perforations was successfully treated with traditional therapeutic drugs combined with vedolizumab: a case report after a long-term follow-up and a review of the literature.

Xue-Mei Xu, Shuang Ye, Ying-Ying Jin, Chen-Xi Liu, Sheng-Fang Bao, Hua Huang, Fei Ding, Zhen Yang, Yan-Liang Jin

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xue-Mei XuDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Shuang YeDepartment of Rheumatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Affiliated Renji Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Ying-Ying JinDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Chen-Xi LiuDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Sheng-Fang BaoDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Hua HuangDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Fei DingDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Zhen YangDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Yan-Liang JinDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastrointestinal perforation in patients with juvenile dermatomyositis has been reported as a life-threatening complication in the literature. However, effective treatment of juvenile dermatomyositis with gastrointestinal perforation remains challenging. We report the case of a patient who developed intestinal perforation 5 months after being diagnosed with anti-nuclear matrix protein 2 antibody-positive juvenile dermatomyositis. We systematically reviewed the literature on the medical and/or surgical treatment of gastrointestinal perforation in juvenile dermatomyositis. In addition to our case, as of October 2023, we identified 29 cases of gastrointestinal perforation in patients with juvenile dermatomyositis. Current treatment options for gastrointestinal perforation in juvenile dermatomyositis mainly include corticosteroids, methylprednisolone pulses, rituximab, intravenous immunoglobulin, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, cyclosporine A, mycophenolate mofetil, and other traditional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. Notably, juvenile dermatomyositis complicated by gastrointestinal perforation is always associated with disease severity and activity. However, these are extremely severe patients who may not respond to treatment with methylprednisolone pulses and rituximab. Given the limited efficacy of conventional high-intensity systemic immunosuppressive therapy for juvenile dermatomyositis with gastrointestinal perforation, there is an urgent need to explore novel therapeutic approaches. We report on the successful use of vedolizumab in combination with corticosteroids, cyclophosphamide, and intravenous immunoglobulin as a novel therapeutic strategy for treating juvenile dermatomyositis complicated by gastrointestinal perforation. Importantly, up to now, there has been no report of juvenile dermatomyositis with gastrointestinal perforation treated with vedolizumab combined with traditional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in children.

Indexed as

abdominal paingastrointestinal bleedinggastrointestinal involvementgastrointestinal perforationjuvenile dermatomyositisvedolizumab

Identifiers

PMID39902228
PMCPMC11788329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.