ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Single-center experience with ultra-early cranioplasty within 3 weeks after decompressive craniectomy.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Early Versus Delayed Cranioplasty After Decompressive Craniectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Brain and behavior · 2026Pooled it
- Ultrasound-guided needle technique as a relaxation strategy for early cranioplasty: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The optimal timing of cranioplasty (CP) after decompressive craniectomy (DC) is inconclusive. This article aims to investigate the effect of different timing of CP on the neurologic prognosis of patients, and to explore the feasibility and safety of ultra-early CP (within 3 weeks) following DC. Methods: The duration time of surgery, intraoperative bleeding volume, surgery-related complications, and activities of daily living (ADL) scores were retrospectively analyzed in 23 patients underwent ultra-early CP performed within 3 weeks, and compared with 136 patients with non-ultra-early CP performed within the same time period. Results: The mean duration time of surgery in the ultra-early group was significantly shorter than that in the non-ultra-early group. ADL scores were significantly lower in the ultra-early group than in the non-ultra-early group both before and 1 month after CP, but there was no statistically significant difference in ADL scores between the two groups at long-term follow-up. The overall incidence of surgery-related complications was 17.39% (4/23) in the ultra-early group and 14.71% (20/136) in the non-ultra-early group, and there was no statistically significant difference in the comparison between the two groups ( Conclusion: Both ultra-early and non-ultra-early CP can significantly improve the neurological prognosis of patients. Ultra-early CP can significantly shorten the length of surgery and does not increase the incidence of surgery-related complications, which has a certain degree of safety and feasibility, and can be popularized under the premise of strict screening of indications, but further research is still needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.