ArticleFrontiers in plant science2024
Genome skimming provides evidence to accept two new genera (Apiaceae) separated from the
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrative chemotaxonomic and micromorphological insights into Peucedanum (Apiaceae).Scientific reports · 2026Article
- New generic classification for Korean Peucedanum L. (Apiaceae) species based on deep phylogenomic study.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- PhytoKeys · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Methods: We used two molecular datasets (103 plastomes and 43 nrDNA sequences) generated by genome skimming to reconstructed a reliable phylogenetic framework with high support and resolution. In addition, we also investigated the divergence time of core clade of endemic taxa. Results and Discussion: Both analyses failed to recover
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.