Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39902192›Full record

ReviewJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025

The Impact of Interdisciplinary Team-Based Care on the Care and Outcomes of Chronically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review.

Ruttanaporn Kongkar, Suebsarn Ruksakulpiwat, Lalipat Phianhasin, Chitchanok Benjasirisan, Atsadaporn Niyomyart, Bootan Hasan Ahmed, Wimolrat Puwarawuttipanit, Wanicha L Chuenkongkaew, Jon Adams

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ruttanaporn KongkarDepartment of Medical Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Suebsarn RuksakulpiwatDepartment of Medical Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-2168-5195
Lalipat PhianhasinDepartment of Medical Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-1960-5539
Chitchanok BenjasirisanDepartment of Medical Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-6465-0721
Atsadaporn NiyomyartRamathibodi School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-5460-2934
Bootan Hasan AhmedFrances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-5105-7659
Wimolrat PuwarawuttipanitDepartment of Medical Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Wanicha L ChuenkongkaewDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-2219-6601
Jon AdamsSchool of Public Health, The University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To examine the impact of interdisciplinary team-based care (ITBC) on chronically ill patients and their outcomes as reported in relevant contemporary literature. Methods: In this systematic review, PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL Plus Full Text, and ten publishers were searched to identify studies published between 2019 and 2024. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were screened for eligible studies and assessed for relevance. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were implemented to ensure that only studies relevant to our objective were included. The convergent integrated analysis framework suggested by the Joanna Briggs Institute was utilized for data synthesis. Results: Ten studies were included in the systematic review. Data synthesis revealed five major themes at different levels: 1) Patient level, including themes of Patients' Self-Improvement and Patients' Health Outcomes; 2) Interpersonal level, including themes of Providers' Work Performance and Shared Decision Making; and 3) Organizational level, including the theme of Healthcare Utilization. Conclusion: ITBC has a significant positive impact on chronically ill patients at multiple levels. At the patient level, it enhances self-management and health outcomes. At the interpersonal level, it improves healthcare providers' performance and promotes shared decision-making. At the organizational level, it leads to more efficient healthcare utilization.

Indexed as

chronic illnessinterdisciplinary team-based carepatient outcomessystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39902192
PMCPMC11789502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.