ArticleArthroplasty today2025
Optimal Bone Preparation for Triple-Tapered Stems: Does the Sagittal Taper Affect Optimal Femoral Sizing?
Article in Arthroplasty today, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Conventional single-tapered, total hip arthroplasty stems achieve fixation namely through coronal, metaphyseal fit. Triple taper stems have a sagittal taper to optimize fixation in the antero-posterior (AP) plane as well; however, limited guidance exists on appropriate bone preparation. Often, similar preparation techniques are used despite geometric differences which may lead to underpreparation. We've defined a novel technique in which a small portion of posterior femoral neck and cancellous bone is removed to permit preparation collinear to the diaphyseal sagittal femoral axis. We hypothesize this will optimize stem fit and stability compared to conventional techniques. Methods: This is a retrospective review of 38 cementless primary total hip arthroplasty cases performed by a single surgeon. In each case, broach preparation was initially performed through the center of the femoral neck as although it was a single-tapered stem. Once tactile sensation of adequate fit was achieved, fluoroscopic images were taken to document AP and mediolateral fit, and stem size was recorded. Then that broach was removed, and a standardized one-third of the posterior femoral neck and posterior cancellous bone was removed, permitting broaches to prepare the femur collinear to the femoral diaphyseal sagittal axis- triple-tapered preparation (TTP). Outcomes included change in stem size from initial broach trial to final stem selection and radiographic stem fill on AP and lateral views. Results: Median single-tapered preparation broach size was 8 (range, 5-12) and final stem size after TTP was 11 (range, 6-13). The TTP overall mean percent metaphyseal fill was 74 ± 6% in the AP view and 71 ± 5% in the lateral view, both significantly higher than single-tapered preparation which was 67 ± 7% and 65 ± 7%, respectively ( Conclusions: Preparation of triple-tapered stems collinear to the diaphyseal sagittal femoral axis improves stem size, fit, and fill.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.