ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2025
All-inside technique for isolated posterior cruciate ligament tears: Surgical technique and outcomes.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Complications Related to Arthroscopic Isolated Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 4162 Patients.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Review
- [Research progress on enhanced recovery after posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025Review
- [Progress in prevention and treatment of knee laxity after posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of this paper is to describe all-inside posterior cruciate ligament (aiPCL) reconstruction surgical technique and to report complications and outcomes in female patients with isolated posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) tears. Methods: Preoperative and postoperative evaluations included posterior drawer test, dial test at 30 Results: Twenty-five female patients with grade II or grade III isolated lesions of the PCL underwent aiPCL reconstruction. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 29.7 ± 12.9 years, while the mean time from injury to surgery was 11 months (range 12-324). No intraoperative/postoperative complications occurred. At the last follow-up, 16 (69.5 %) and 5 (21.5 %) patients had a grade A and B posterior drawer test, respectively, while the dial test (30 Conclusions: The arthroscopic aiPCL reconstruction seems safe and effective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.