ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Hippocampus-sparing volume-modulated arc therapy in patients with World Health Organization grade II glioma: a feasibility study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Radiotherapy can improve the survival rates of patients with glioma; meanwhile, impaired cognitive functions have been brought to the forefront with the offending organ, the radiosensitive hippocampus. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of hippocampus-sparing volumetric-modulated arc therapy (HS VMAT) in patients with World Health Organization (WHO) grade II glioma. Methods: HS VMAT plans and non-hippocampus-sparing volumetric-modulated arc therapy (NHS VMAT) plans were generated using a computed tomography (CT) dataset of 10 patients who underwent postoperative radiotherapy. The dose volume histogram (DVH), homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), and irradiated dose of the hippocampus and other organs at risk (OARs) were analyzed. Results: No significant differences were observed in HI and CI between the two plans. Regarding the protection of OARs, HS VMAT plans were equally capable and even lowered the radiation dosages to the brainstem (35.56 vs. 41.74 Gy, p = 0.017) and spinal cord (1.34 vs. 1.43 Gy, p = 0.006). Notably, HS VMAT plans markedly decreased doses to the ipsilateral hippocampus and the contralateral hippocampus, demonstrating its efficacy in hippocampal dose reduction. Conclusion: The HS VMAT plan can be used to efficiently lower the dosage delivered to the hippocampus and may, to some extent, help lessen the risk of cognitive damage. The encouraging results of our study need to be further validated by clinical trials to confirm the benefits of the HS VMAT plans in preserving cognitive functions in patients with glioma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.