ArticleThe World Allergy Organization journal2025
Long-term effects of dupilumab on chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: A step towards clinical remission.
Article in The World Allergy Organization journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impact of dose and administration schedule on biologic efficacy in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a network meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Dupilumab in Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps Patients: Impact on Tissue Eosinophilic Inflammation and Eosinophil Subphenotypes.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2026Article
- Efficacy and Safety of IL-4Rα and IL-5/IL-5R Targeted Biologic Therapies in Type 2 Inflammatory Airway Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Chronic Rhinosinusitis Optimisation of Nasal Outcomes and Scores (CHRONOS): An Italian Delphi Consensus on Long-Term Management with Biologics.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2026Review
- High Remission Rate in Eosinophilic Chronic Rhinosinusitis Following More Than Two Years of Dupilumab Therapy.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2025Article
- A Literature Review of the Management of Nasal Polyps: Biologics Combined With Endoscopic Surgery.Cureus · 2025Review
- Dupilumab-Induced Remission in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps and Comorbid Asthma: A 24-Month Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Exploring dupilumab for asthma: from mechanistic insights to clinical outcomes, safety, and cost-effectiveness.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objectives: Clinical remission, defined as the absence of disease activity and symptoms, is an emerging goal in the management of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). This study aimed to evaluate the long-term effects of dupilumab on patients with CRSwNP, with or without asthma, and explore the potential for achieving clinical remission. Methods: A two-year prospective study was conducted on 109 patients with CRSwNP, with or without asthma, who were eligible for dupilumab as an add-on therapy. Comprehensive assessments, including clinical, laboratory, and radiological evaluations, were performed before and after treatment. Clinical remission of CRSwNP was defined as 12 months of dupilumab treatment, no exacerbations requiring oral corticosteroids (OCS), no need for nasal sinus operation, no anosmia or hyposmia, a Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) score under 20, and a Lund-Mackay score (LMS) below 10. For those with comorbid asthma, clinical remission was defined as an asthma control test (ACT) score of 19 or higher, no asthma exacerbations, and no need for OCS. Results: Dupilumab significantly improved CRSwNP outcomes in both groups, including SNOT-22 scores, nasal polyp size (LMS), and anosmia/hyposmia. Comorbid asthma was highly prevalent (79.8%), and patients with asthma had significantly larger nasal polyps, both before and after dupilumab therapy, despite similar symptom improvement. Higher fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and blood eosinophil count (BEC) levels, along with anosmia/hyposmia, predicted larger polyp size. Dupilumab also significantly improved asthma outcomes, increasing forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and decreasing FeNO. Clinical remission was achieved in 11% of patients, with a slightly lower rate in those with asthma (7.3%). Conclusion: Dupilumab treatment can achieve clinical remission in CRSwNP. However, comorbid asthma appears to reduce the likelihood of remission and is associated with larger nasal polyps, even with similar symptom improvement. Asthma may independently influence polyp development, potentially impacting long-term outcomes in CRSwNP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.