Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39902050›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024

The generation and evaluation of TKO/hCD55/hTM/hEPCR gene-modified pigs for clinical organ xenotransplantation.

Guoli Huai, Yong Wang, Jiaxiang Du, Zhenhui Cheng, Yuxuan Xie, Jia Zhou, Hongmei Tang, Yanyan Jiang, Xiangyang Xing, Shaoping Deng and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. CRISPR-Cas9 in the Tailoring of Genetically Engineered Animals.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  8. Gene Editing inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Guoli Huai *Clinical Immunology Translational Medicine Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Yong Wang *Chengdu ClonOrgan Biotechnology, Co., Ltd., Chengdu, China.
Jiaxiang DuChengdu ClonOrgan Biotechnology, Co., Ltd., Chengdu, China.
Zhenhui ChengChengdu ClonOrgan Biotechnology, Co., Ltd., Chengdu, China.
Yuxuan XieClinical Immunology Translational Medicine Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Jia ZhouClinical Immunology Translational Medicine Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Hongmei TangClinical Immunology Translational Medicine Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Yanyan JiangChengdu ClonOrgan Biotechnology, Co., Ltd., Chengdu, China.
Xiangyang XingChengdu ClonOrgan Biotechnology, Co., Ltd., Chengdu, China.
Shaoping DengClinical Immunology Translational Medicine Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Dengke PanClinical Immunology Translational Medicine Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Genetically edited pigs, modified using CRISPR-Cas9 technology, hold promise as potential sources for xenotransplantation. However, the optimal combination of genetic modifications and their expression levels for initial clinical trials remains unclear. This study investigates the generation of TKO/hCD55/hTM/hEPCR (6GE) pigs and evaluates their compatibility with human immune and coagulation systems. Methods: The 6GE pigs were generated through iterative genome editing and F1 generation breeding. Genotyping, flow cytometry, and immunohistochemistry confirmed the knockout of GGTA1, CMAH, and B4GALNT2. Expression levels of human genes (hCD55, hTM, hEPCR) were quantified. In vitro assays using aortic endothelial cells (pAECs) from 6GE pigs assessed human serum IgM and IgG binding, complement cytotoxicity, and thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) complex levels. Blood from gene-edited pigs was used for pathophysiological analysis. Results: Complete knockout of GGTA1, CMAH, and B4GALNT2 was confirmed in 6GE pigs. The expression of hCD55 and hTM was approximately seven and thirteen times higher than in humans, respectively, while hEPCR levels were comparable to those in humans. Discussion: Highly expressing hCD55, along with the co-expression of hEPCR and hTM genes, is expected to effectively reduce human complement cytotoxicity and enhance anticoagulant efficacy in genetically modified pigs. The 6GE pigs exhibited robust compatibility with human physiological and immune systems, fulfilling the criteria for clinical trials. Furthermore, it is imperative to rear donor pigs in pathogen-free (DPF) facilities to mitigate infection risks and prevent the transmission of porcine pathogens to humans.

Indexed as

Membrane Cofactor ProteinTransplantation, HeterologousAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedCRISPR-Cas SystemsEndothelial CellsGalactosyltransferasesGene EditingGene Knockout TechniquesHumansImmunoglobulin MMixed Function OxygenasesN-AcetylgalactosaminyltransferasesSwinealpha-1,3-galactosyltransferase 1, porcinebeta-1,4-N-acetyl-galactosaminyl transferase 2CMPacetylneuraminate monooxygenaseGalactosyltransferasesImmunoglobulin MMembrane Cofactor ProteinMixed Function OxygenasesN-AcetylgalactosaminyltransferasesDPF facilitygenetically modified pigsinfectionTKO/hCD55/hTM/hEPCRxenotransplantation

Identifiers

PMID39902050
PMCPMC11788277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.