ReviewCureus2025
Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement With Initial Access to the Peripheral Compartment: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Top ten causes of non-arthritic hip pain: A comprehensive review.World journal of orthopedics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this review is to report clinical outcomes of patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) with initial access to the peripheral compartment (PC) of the hip. A search following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was performed in the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases. Studies in which clinical outcomes were reported for patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for FAI with initial access to the PC were included. Data on study characteristics, patient demographics, radiographic outcomes, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), complications, and secondary surgery were extracted. Five studies with 881 patients and 976 hips (55.2% male, age range 32.1 to 48.4 years, follow-up range 3.0 to 74.4 months) were included. In two studies reporting radiographic measurements, the range of preoperative and postoperative alpha angle was 55.5° to 68.7° and 45.5° to 48.3°, respectively. The range of preoperative and postoperative lateral center-edge angles was 33.8° to 39.2° and 30.5° to 32.9°, respectively. Four studies reported one or more PRO measures with all demonstrating significant preoperative to postoperative improvement. The postoperative Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS) and Visual Analog Score (VAS) pain scales ranged from 78.0 to 83.2 and 1.4 to 2.8, respectively. Complication rates ranged from 0.3% to 23.3%, with the rate of paresthesia specifically ranging from 0% to 8.1%. The rate of secondary surgery ranged from 0% to 6.3%. The rate of revision hip arthroscopy and conversion to total hip arthroplasty, specifically, ranged from 0% to 3.1% and 0% to 3.7%, respectively. This systematic review demonstrates that hip arthroscopy for FAI with initial access to the PC shows significant improvements in PROs with low rates of complications and secondary surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.