Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39901996›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Exploring the Realm of Physical Activity in Pregnant Indian Women: Understanding Their Knowledge, Practice, and Obstacles.

Smita Singh, Mukta Agarwal, Prashant K Singh, Indira Prasad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Smita SinghObstetrics and Gynecology, Paras Healthcare, Patna, IND.
Mukta AgarwalObstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) Patna, Patna, IND.
Prashant K SinghCommunity Medicine, Netaji Subhas Medical College and Hospital, Patna, IND.
Indira PrasadObstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) Patna, Patna, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background The study aimed to assess the knowledge of pregnant Indian women about antenatal exercises (ANEs), the challenges they face, and the motivating factors influencing their participation in physical activities. The main objective and practical implication of this research were to evaluate the prevalence of physical activity (PA) among pregnant women in Indian hospitals while also identifying the specific challenges that hinder physical activity among this demographic. Hypothesis or aim The hypothesis suggested that the lack of knowledge contributes to low physical activity levels, and healthcare professionals can address this through education. The research aimed to identify obstacles to physical activity among pregnant women in India. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary healthcare facility, involving 400 pregnant women (24-36-week gestational age {GA}) receiving prenatal care. The participants completed a detailed questionnaire and interviews to assess their knowledge, routines, challenges, and sources of motivation, aiming to understand the perspectives and experiences of pregnant women. Findings Findings revealed that 36% of the participants had good knowledge, while 64% had poor knowledge. Only 16.5% engaged in regular exercise, with most not prioritizing physical activity. Few exercisers met the recommended daily exercise duration, with walking being the most popular activity. Discussion Pregnant Indian women have poor knowledge and practice of antenatal exercise compared to their Western counterparts. By addressing barriers and involving healthcare professionals, positive changes can be made to enhance understanding in this area. Conclusion This investigation highlights a significant gap in knowledge and practice of antenatal exercise among the participants.

Indexed as

antenatal exercisebarrierknowledgemotivating factorsphysical activitypractice

Identifiers

PMID39901996
PMCPMC11788225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.