Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39901981›Full record

ReviewSexual offending (Trier, Germany)2023

Recent Advances in the Neuropsychology of Pedophilia.

Shelby D Leverett, Gilian Tenbergen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sexual offending (Trier, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shelby D LeverettDivision of Biology and Biomedical Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0914-2182
Gilian TenbergenDepartment of Psychology, State University of New York at Oswego, Oswego, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3496-5789

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A considerable amount of research has investigated the relationship between potential neuropsychological dysfunction, pedophilia, and sexual offending against children. Until recently, these studies focused primarily on the relationship between executive functions and sexual offending against children, collapsing across underlying sexual preferences, like pedophilia. Prior research suggests neuropsychological dysfunction in individuals who have committed child sexual abuse. However, there are still unanswered questions about how these impairments relate to pedophilia as a sexual preference and whether these impairments are also observed in pedophilic individuals who do not offend. This review will discuss current findings as they relate to pedophilia, while using theoretical frameworks to guide future research.

Indexed as

executive functionsminor attractionneuropsychologypedophiliasexual abuse

Identifiers

PMID39901981
PMCPMC11789445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.