ReviewClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2025
Effectiveness and Safety of Dupilumab and Tralokinumab for Treating Atopic Dermatitis and Pruritic Skin Disorders in Oncological Patients: A Narrative Review.
Review in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding Biologics in CRSwNP: Related Events and Insights.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2026Review
- Transitioning from Cyclosporine to Tralokinumab in Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Prospective Real-World Comparison of Direct Switch vs. Short Overlap.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- Skin Reactions and Other Underappreciated Dermatologic Side Effects of Cancer Therapies.Current treatment options in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Atopic dermatitis (AD) and pruritic skin disorders are increasingly recognized in cancer patients. The management of these conditions in patients with a history or with concomitant cancer presents unique challenges, as traditional systemic therapies may pose risks due to their immunosuppressive effects. In recent years, biologic agents such as dupilumab and tralokinumab have emerged as promising treatments for AD, offering targeted modulation of the immune response with potentially fewer systemic side effects. This article aims to review the current evidence on the safety and efficacy of dupilumab and tralokinumab in treating AD and pruritus among cancer survivors, addressing the potential benefits and considerations for this unique patient population. Methods: A comprehensive analysis of the current medical literature was performed on the PubMed, Ovid, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases until December 15, 2024. In conducting this narrative review, Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and medical terminology related to clinical trials and real-life studies were employed, focusing on the pharmacological agents dupilumab, and tralokinumab. Discussion: Patients with active or past cancer are typically excluded from clinical trials of new medications, complicating the evaluation of cancer progression or recurrence risks in these patients setting. The potential use of biologic drugs like dupilumab and tralokinumab in oncological patients marks a significant breakthrough for treating conditions such as eczema and pruritus, which are common in this patient group. Although there are no explicit contraindications for using dupilumab and tralokinumab in patients with active cancer or a history of malignancy, there is no definitive guidance on their use in such cases. Real-world data is emerging, facilitated by collaboration between dermatologists and oncologists, supporting the effectiveness and safety of dupilumab and tralokinumab for managing AD in cancer patients. Nonetheless, larger studies with longer follow-up periods and dedicated pharmacovigilance programs are needed to substantiate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.