ArticlePreventive medicine reports2025
Post-marketing safety surveillance for the recombinant zoster vaccine (Shingrix), vaccine adverse event reporting system, United States, October 2017-April 2024.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Guillain-Barré Syndrome Following Recombinant Zoster Vaccine in US Medicare Adults Age 65 Years or Older.Drug safety · 2026Article
- Safety profile of herpes zoster vaccines in the United States: a descriptive and disproportionality analysis of adverse events reported to the vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS), 2017-2024.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- The safety of co-administration of recombinant zoster vaccine (Shingrix) and influenza vaccines in the elderly in VAERS during 2018-2024.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
- Review
- One Health adjuvant selection for vaccines against zoonotic infections.Exploration of medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV), received its first marketing authorization in October 2017 to prevent herpes zoster and its complications in older adults. The purpose of this study was to provide comprehensively worldwide post-marketing safety information about RZV using data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Methods: We searched for and analyzed adverse event (AE) reports of RZV submitted to U.S. VAERS between October 20, 2017 and April 26, 2024. Descriptive analyses included sex, age, time-to-onset, seriousness, most commonly reported AEs, AE of special interest, and cause of death. The empirical Bayesian data mining was employed to identify potential disproportionalities in reporting. Results: During the study period, 1,279,596 AE reports for vaccines were received by VAERS after excluding any duplicates, including 66,849 reports specifically related to RZV. Most reports were classified as non-serious (97.3 %). Among reports with age or sex reported, individuals were mainly 50-79 years (71.2 %) and females (63.1 %). The most commonly reported AEs included injection site reactions, pyrexia, chills, headache and fatigue. A total of 86 reports documenting deaths were identified following RZV vaccination. In addition to cardiovascular events and falls, Guillain-Barre syndrome was the most common cause of death. The median TTO for RZV-related AEs was 1 day in all cohort groups over 50 years old. Conclusion: The safety profile of RZV, based on the large sample post-marketing use, was reassuring and consistent with that observed in clinical trials. Further studies are needed to continue generating real-world safety data and further characterize RZV-AE pairs systematically.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.