ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025
Case Report: Endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion using percutaneous unilateral biportal endoscopy and 3D printing for an andersson lesion in ankylosing spondylitis.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Advances in application of digital technologies in surgery for ankylosing spondylitis].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: An Andersson lesion (AL) is a late-stage lesion of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) that can be misdiagnosed. If the patient has unbearable pain or symptoms indicative of neurological damage, then posterior fusion can be considered. Compared with open surgical procedures, combining Unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) and 3D-printing technologies for endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) can offer the advantages of minimal trauma and the same effect. In this study, we first used UBE with endoscopic LIF for an AL between T12 and L1 in a 43-year-old male patient with good clinical outcomes. Methods: A 43-year-old man was admitted to our hospital due to recurrent back pain for 8 years. Based on imaging (computed tomography and radiography) findings, medical history, and clinical examination, we carried out an HLA-B27 blood test to confirm the diagnosis of AS with AL. Finally, we undertook fully endoscopic LIF with UBE based on a 3D-printing model. This patient's pre- and postoperative radiological and clinical results were presented. Results: Accurate preoperative planning based on a 3D-printing model is strongly recommended for patients with an AL who have ambiguous anatomic landmarks. Applying endoscopic techniques and 3D-printing technologies to the surgical treatment of AL is completely feasible and has an edge in terms of tissue damage. Conclusion: Endoscopic LIF with UBE based on a 3D-printing model showed a favorable clinical and radiological result and appears to be a safe and effective technique for an AL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.