Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39901884›Full record

ArticleDementia & neuropsychologia2025

Comparative discourse analysis of logical memory recall in normal elderly from rural and urban areas.

Lúcia Inês de Araújo, Sérgio Leme da Silva, Leonardo Caixeta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dementia & neuropsychologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lúcia Inês de AraújoUniversidade Federal de Goiás, Hospital das Clínicas, Serviço de Fonoaudiologia, Goiânia GO, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7460-024X
Sérgio Leme da SilvaUniversidade Federal de São Carlos, Laboratório de Neurociências do Bem-Estar, Departamento de Psicologia, São Carlos SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4417-3743
Leonardo CaixetaUniversidade Federal de Goiás, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Neurologia, Serviço de Neurologia Cognitiva e Neuropsiquiatria (CERNE), Goiânia GO, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5736-9058

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined the nature of errors in prose recall made in normal aging from different cultural backgrounds: rural and urban areas. Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the nature of errors in prose recall made in normal aging from different cultural backgrounds. Methods: We evaluated neurologically normal elderly divided into two groups: 12 subjects resident in a rural area in Central Brazil (group 1, called "Interior") and 10 subjects from a metropolitan area in a big city in Central Brazil (group 2, called "Metropolis"). Responses by 22 nondemented older adults to the Logical Memory subtest of the Wechsler Memory Scale were examined in a propositional analysis. Results: Healthy older adults from rural areas (interior group) showed good immediate recalls, but had deficits in retention over a delay. Subjects from urban areas made errors of omission, not commission, at immediate recall. Conclusion: These errors probably reflect difficulty with attentional control rather than memory per se. There are differences in the performance of the elderly when considering different levels of education for neuropsychological tests associated with immediate recalls (but not with delayed recall), suggesting that working memory systems may be more impacted by years of schooling than the coding memory system.

Indexed as

MemoryRural AreasShort-TermUrban AreaWechsler Memory Scale

Identifiers

PMID39901884
PMCPMC11790069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.