ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2025
Outcomes of endovascular thrombectomy in patients with cerebral venous thrombosis: A cohort study of 325 patients.
Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cerebral venous thrombosis: Current management, recent advances and future directions.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is a rare condition that presents with significant treatment challenges and has traditionally been managed with anticoagulation. However, for patients who fail anticoagulation or present with severe symptoms, endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) has emerged as a favorable treatment modality. This study examines the outcomes, complications, and comorbidities associated with EVT in patients with CVT.
methodsA query of the 2015-2019 National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample was performed for patients admitted to hospitals with ICD-10 diagnosis codes for CVT and ICD-10 procedure codes for usage of EVT. Demographic information, baseline comorbidities, complications, and discharge dispositions were compared between patients who underwent EVT and those who were managed medically.
resultsA total of 36,005 patients diagnosed with CVT were identified from 2015(Q4) to 2019. Of these patients, 325 (0.9%) received EVT. Patients who underwent EVT were older (<0.001), more likely to be female (p = 0.016), and had higher rates of diabetes mellitus (p = 0.012), hypertension (p < 0.001), and obesity (p < 0.001). These patients also presented with more severe neurological symptoms, including higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores (p < 0.001), coma (p < 0.001), and cerebral edema (p < 0.001). Patients undergoing EVT had a higher incidence of in-hospital mortality (p = 0.007) and were less likely to be discharged routinely (p < 0.001).
conclusionsThis study found that patients with CVT who underwent EVT were older, more likely to be female, and presented with more severe neurological conditions. After controlling for severity, EVT in patients with CVT was associated with significant risks, including higher rates of complications and inpatient mortality. Although EVT is associated with significant risks, the findings of this study suggest that its outcomes may reflect the severity of the underlying condition rather than the procedure itself. Careful patient selection and individualized management strategies are essential for optimizing outcomes in this high-risk population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.