Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39901725›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2025

In vitro fermentation characteristics of dietary fibers using fecal inoculum from dogs consuming commercial or grain kefir.

Breanna N Metras, Patricia M Oba, Dalton A Holt, Laura L Bauer, Michael J Miller, Ryan N Dilger, Kelly S Swanson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Breanna N MetrasDivision of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Patricia M ObaDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2473-1791
Dalton A HoltDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Laura L BauerDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Michael J MillerDivision of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Ryan N DilgerDivision of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2538-2845
Kelly S SwansonDivision of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5518-3076

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional grain kefir is produced from the fermentation of milk with yeast- and bacteria-containing cultures. To maintain consistency and adhere to food safety guidelines, commercial kefir products are based on starter bacterial cultures. Bacterial profiles of starter vs. grain kefirs differ, and their influence on health effects is unknown. Our objectives were to determine the in vitro fermentation characteristics of common dietary fibers using fecal inoculum from dogs supplemented with kefir or kefir bacterial culture as inoculum. Healthy adult dogs were allotted to one of 3 treatments and supplemented for 14 d (n = 4/treatment): 1) 2% reduced-fat milk treated with lactase (CNTL), 2) starter kefir (S-Kefir), or 3) grain kefir (G-Kefir). After 14 d, fresh fecal samples were collected and frozen in a 20% glycerol solution. For the in vitro experiment, fecal samples were thawed, diluted in an anaerobic diluting solution, and used to inoculate tubes containing semi-defined medium and either cellulose (CEL), pectin (PC), beet pulp (BP), or chicory pulp (CP). Tubes were incubated for 0, 6, 12, or 18 h, with short-chain fatty acids (SCFA), pH, and microbiota measured at each time point. A second in vitro experiment was conducted using similar methods and measurements but with S-Kefir and G-Kefir as inoculum sources. Effects of treatment (inoculum), time, and treatment*time interactions within the fiber source were analyzed statistically using Mixed Models and repeated measures, with P < 0.05 being significant. Using fecal inoculum, BP and PC were rapidly fermented, leading to large pH reductions, SCFA increases, and microbiota shifts. pH change was of greater (P < 0.05) magnitude (PC) and higher (P < 0.05) kinetic rate (CP) when using feces from dogs fed S-Kefir or G-Kefir than controls. Butyrate increases were greater (P < 0.05) in tubes inoculated with G-Kefir feces than in S-Kefir or control feces. When PC and BP were fermented, tubes with S-Kefir feces had greater (P < 0.05) acetate, propionate, and total SCFA increases than G-Kefir or control feces. Fermentations were slower when using kefir cultures as inoculum, but some differences were noted. Bacterial beta diversity and relative abundances shifted over time within each substrate and were unique to the inoculum source. Our data suggest that the activity of kefir bacterial populations differs and that kefir consumption changes the abundance and activity of the fecal microbiota of dogs, justifying in vivo investigation.

Indexed as

Dietary FiberFecesKefirAnimal FeedAnimalsBacteriaDietDogsFatty Acids, VolatileFemaleFermentationGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMaleDietary FiberFatty Acids, Volatilecompanion animalfermented foodmicrobiotapet food

Identifiers

PMID39901725
PMCPMC11912828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.