ArticleRecent advances in inflammation & allergy drug discovery2025
Evaluation of
Article in Recent advances in inflammation & allergy drug discovery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction
objectiveThis study employs computational methods (
methodsFor this aim, amino acid sequences of TgPLP1 and TgPLP2 were retrieved and submitted to the ProtParam (physicochemical), VaxiJen v2.0 (antigenicity), NetSurfP-6.0 (2D structure), Robetta (3D structure) web servers, along with the IEDB server to decipher the immunogenic epitopes. Subcellular characteristics such as signal peptide, transmembrane domain, post-translational modifications (PTMs), and cellular localization were also predicted.
resultsBoth proteins had a high MW of 125.50 and 92.21, respectively, with an alkaline pI, a 30 hours half-life in mammalian reticulocytes, good thermotolerance (high aliphatic index), and hydrophilicity properties (negative GRAVY). They also showed good antigenicity (0.7021 [PLP1] vs 0.5701 [PLP2]), while they were non-allergenic. Both proteins were extracellular with numerous post-translational modification sites (phosphorylation, glycosylation, and acetylation), and a transmembrane domain was only present in TgPLP1, with no signal peptide in both. Furthermore, numerous immunogenic B- and T-cell epitopes were identified within the TgPLPs sequences, suggesting their potential for inclusion in multi-epitope vaccine designs.
conclusionFurther studies are needed to confirm these findings and assess the efficacy of the proposed vaccine constructs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39901670What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.