ArticleClinical and experimental otorhinolaryngology2025
Balloon Eustachian Tuboplasty in Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media and Dilatory Eustachian Tube Dysfunction: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Clinical and experimental otorhinolaryngology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Global Burden of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction in Older Patients: Pathophysiology, Clinical Consequences, Diagnostic Challenges and Therapeutic Perspectives-A SANRA-Based Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation promotes recovery from otitis media by activating the α7nAChR-mediated anti-inflammatory pathway.Inflammation and regeneration · 2026Article
- Construction and validation of a machine learning-based prediction model for postoperative complications in patients with chronic otitis media.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesBalloon eustachian tuboplasty (BET) is an emerging treatment for dilatory eustachian tube (ET) dysfunction, yet its efficacy in patients with chronic suppurative otitis media (COM) combined with ET dysfunction remains unclear. This trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BET versus medical management (MM) alone in adult patients with COM and chronic dilatory ET dysfunction, as defined by a failed Valsalva maneuver.
methodsThis prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial enrolled 116 participants (121 ears) between January 2021 and June 2023. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either BET combined with MM or MM alone (fluticasone furoate nasal steroid spray). The primary short-term outcome was the normalization of the Valsalva maneuver at 8 weeks, while secondary outcomes included improvements in Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire-7 (ETDQ-7) scores and reductions in the air-bone gap (ABG) measured at 8 weeks. Adverse events were monitored in both groups throughout the follow-up period.
resultsOf the 116 participants (121 ears), 60 participants (62 ears) received BET and 56 participants (59 ears) received MM alone. There were no significant differences in demographics, baseline characteristics, ETDQ-7 scores, bone conduction thresholds, or ABG between the groups. In the BET group, 46.8% of ears (29/62) achieved a successful Valsalva maneuver compared with 15.3% of ears (9/59) in the MM-only group (P<0.001). The BET group exhibited greater subjective symptom improvement, with an average ETDQ-7 score reduction of -6.2±9.4 compared to -2.6±8.6 in the MM-only group (P=0.028). Additionally, the ABG decreased more significantly in the BET group (-5.8±11.4 dB HL) than in the MM-only group (-1.2±10.5 dB HL) (P=0.023). No serious procedure- or device-related adverse events were observed during the 8-week follow-up.
conclusionThis trial demonstrates that BET combined with MM is superior to MM alone in treating dilatory ET dysfunction in patients with COM, while also maintaining a favorable safety profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.