ReviewSmall methods2025
From Single to Multi-Material 3D Printing of Glass-Ceramics for Micro-Optics.
Review in Small methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent Advances in Two-Photon Lithography of 3D Inorganic Microstructures: Glass, Ceramics, Metals, and Carbon.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Review
- Opportunities of Semiconducting Oxide Nanostructures as Advanced Luminescent Materials in Photonics.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Review
- From Static Scaffolds to Responsive Implants: 3D-Printed Field-Active Bioceramics for Adaptive Bone Regeneration.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Deployable 3D architectures from wafer-fabricated precursors.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Low-Temperature Glass 3D Printing via Two-Photon and Single-Photon Polymerization of Oligo-Silsesquioxanes.Polymers · 2025Article
- From Single to Multi-Material 3D Printing of Glass-Ceramics for Micro-Optics.Small methods · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Feynman's statement, "There is plenty of room at the bottom", underscores vast potential at the atomic scale, envisioning microscopic machines. Today, this vision extends into 3D space, where thousands of atoms and molecules are volumetrically patterned to create light-driven technologies. To fully harness their potential, 3D designs must incorporate high-refractive-index elements with exceptional mechanical and chemical resilience. The frontier, however, lies in creating spatially patterned micro-optical architectures in glass and ceramic materials of dissimilar compositions. This multi-material capability enables novel ways of shaping light, leveraging the interaction between diverse interfaced chemical compositions to push optical boundaries. Specifically, it encompasses both multi-material integration within the same architectures and the use of different materials for distinct architectural features in an optical system. Integrating fluid handling systems with two-photon lithography (TPL) provides a promising approach for rapidly prototyping such complex components. This review examines single and multi-material TPL processes, discussing photoresin customization, essential physico-chemical conditions, and the need for cross-scale characterization to assess optical quality. It reflects on challenges in characterizing multi-scale architectures and outlines advancements in TPL for both single and spatially patterned multi-material structures. The roadmap provides a bridge between research and industry, emphasizing collaboration and contributions to advancing micro-optics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.