ReviewEuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology2025
Mechanical circulatory support for complex, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention.
Review in EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early Feasibility Study of a Novel Mechanical Circulatory Support Device for High-Risk PCI.Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions · 2026Article
- New sheathless supra-aortic pulsatile mechanical support via subclavian access for combined protected percutaneous coronary intervention and transcatheter aortic valve implantation in hostile vascular disease: a case report.European heart journal. Case reports · 2026Article
- Patient selection for complex, high-risk indicated percutaneous coronary intervention procedures: an overview.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Article
- Impella™-protected PCI in a post-CABG patient with advanced biventricular dysfunction and mitral regurgitation.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Article
- Protected percutaneous coronary intervention of complex distal left main disease with Impella CP™ support.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Article
- Sex Differences in Outcomes of Complex Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Assisted With Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) in high-risk (HR) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2026Article
- Vascular access options for complex high-risk indicated percutaneous coronary interventions: contemporary strategies, trade-offs, and practical algorithms.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Management of femoral large-bore access and closure during microaxial flow pump-supported interventions.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The evidence base evaluating the use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices in complex, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention is evolving from a small number of randomised clinical trials to incorporate an amassing body of real-world data. Due to both the growing incidence of the procedures and the limitations of the evidence, there is wide variability in the use of MCS, and the benefits are actively debated. The goal of this review is to perform an integrated analysis of randomised and non-randomised studies which have informed clinical and regulatory decision-making in contemporary clinical practice. In addition, we describe forthcoming studies that have been specifically designed to advance the field and resolve ongoing controversies that remain unanswered for this complex, high-risk patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.