ArticleJournal of immunotherapy (Hagerstown, Md. : 1997)2025
Multi-institutional Analysis of Immune-Oncology Combination Therapy for Metastatic MiT Family Translocation Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Article in Journal of immunotherapy (Hagerstown, Md. : 1997), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated Molecular, Genomic, and Clinical Characterization of Pediatric and Adolescent Translocation Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Report from the Children's Oncology Group.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Review
- Systemic Treatment of Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.Cancers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
summaryMetastatic translocation renal cell carcinomas (mtRCCs) are rare and aggressive tumors with limited treatment options. Recent studies demonstrated promising activity of immune-oncology (IO) combinations in mtRCC. However, the effectiveness of dual IO combinations versus IO plus VEGF-TKI combinations remains unclear. We conducted a retrospective analysis of IO combinations in mtRCC patients at 4 institutions. Eligible patients had confirmed mtRCC by genitourinary pathologist and received IO combination therapy (IO+IO or IO+VEGF-TKI). Clinical data and treatment outcomes were recorded from the start of systemic therapy. Objective response rate (ORR) was retrospectively evaluated, and time to treatment failure (TTF), and overall survival (OS) were compared for IO+IO and IO+VEGF-TKI groups. We identified 22 mtRCC patients who received IO combinations, all confirmed to have TFE3 rearrangement by FISH. Most patients were female (68%) with a median age of 41 years (16-79). Treatment breakdown included: IO+IO (n=8, 36%) and IO+VEGF-TKI (n=14, 64%). In the evaluable patients for the efficacy analysis, ORR was 14% (1/7) for the IO+IO group and 54% (6/11) for the IO+VEGF-TKI group. With a median follow-up of 32.4 months, the median TTF was 1.2 months and 6.2 months in the IO+IO and IO+VEGF-TKI groups, respectively ( P =0.12). There was no statistically significant difference in median OS between both groups, 36.7 months in the IO+IO group and 15.6 months in IO+VEGF-TKI ( P =0.9). Our findings demonstrate that IO+VEGF-TKI resulted in higher ORR and TTF point estimates without statistically detectable differences, compared with IO+IO therapy. Larger studies are needed to validate these findings and optimize treatment selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.