ArticleJournal of veterinary science2025
Serological baseline, antibody stability and efficacy of different types of avian influenza (H5) vaccines.
Article in Journal of veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
importanceEvaluating Iran's national highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) control program can inform vaccine selection, optimize immunization duration, guide exit strategies, and assess hemagglutination inhibition (HI) and serum neutralization (SN) methods.
objectiveTo establish a serological baseline, assess antibody stability, and compare the efficacy of three HPAI (H5) vaccines.
methodsWe analyzed over 9,000 blood samples and 6,420 swabs from approximately 1.5 million birds up to 64 weeks old. HI (β, α), RT-PCR, and SN tests were conducted, with statistical analysis performed using two-way ANOVA.
resultsThe serological baseline (GM titer) using H5N8 antigens from A/Chicken/Iran/162/2016 varied. The Re6+Re8 vaccine produced higher and more stable HI β titers than the H5N3 and baculovirus vaccines. Serum HI α neutralization ability was similar for Re6+Re8 and H5N3 vaccines, both 100 times greater than the baculovirus vaccine. Neutralization indices for H5N3, Re6+Re8, and baculovirus vaccines were 4.7, 4.5, and 4.2 (log2), respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: After two vaccinations, Re6+Re8 exhibited the most stable HI β antibody response, while H5N3 had the highest neutralization index, surpassing Re6+Re8 by 0.2 and the baculovirus vaccine by 0.5. These findings highlight discrepancies between HI β and SN test results, with SN being a stronger indicator of protective titers due to its in vivo methodology, compared to the in vitro HI assay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.