Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39901307›Full record

ArticleStem cell research & therapy2025

Enhanced myofibroblast differentiation of eMSCs in intrauterine adhesions.

Jun Song, Meiqi Li, Yuan Tao, Yumeng Li, Canrong Mai, Jingting Zhang, Lan Yao, Shaoquan Shi, Jianyong Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell research & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jun Song *Key Laboratory of Animal Cellular and Genetic Engineering of Heilongjiang Province, College of Life Science, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, 150000, People's Republic of China.
Meiqi Li *Key Laboratory of Animal Cellular and Genetic Engineering of Heilongjiang Province, College of Life Science, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, 150000, People's Republic of China.
Yuan TaoKey Laboratory of Animal Cellular and Genetic Engineering of Heilongjiang Province, College of Life Science, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, 150000, People's Republic of China.
Yumeng LiShenzhen Key Laboratory of Reproductive Immunology for Peri-Implantation, Shenzhen Zhongshan Institute for Reproduction and Genetics, Shenzhen Zhongshan Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital (Formerly Shenzhen Zhongshan Urology Hospital), Shenzhen, 518000, People's Republic of China.
Canrong MaiShenzhen Key Laboratory of Reproductive Immunology for Peri-Implantation, Shenzhen Zhongshan Institute for Reproduction and Genetics, Shenzhen Zhongshan Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital (Formerly Shenzhen Zhongshan Urology Hospital), Shenzhen, 518000, People's Republic of China.
Jingting ZhangShenzhen Key Laboratory of Reproductive Immunology for Peri-Implantation, Shenzhen Zhongshan Institute for Reproduction and Genetics, Shenzhen Zhongshan Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital (Formerly Shenzhen Zhongshan Urology Hospital), Shenzhen, 518000, People's Republic of China.
Lan YaoShenzhen Key Laboratory of Reproductive Immunology for Peri-Implantation, Shenzhen Zhongshan Institute for Reproduction and Genetics, Shenzhen Zhongshan Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital (Formerly Shenzhen Zhongshan Urology Hospital), Shenzhen, 518000, People's Republic of China.
Shaoquan ShiShenzhen Key Laboratory of Reproductive Immunology for Peri-Implantation, Shenzhen Zhongshan Institute for Reproduction and Genetics, Shenzhen Zhongshan Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital (Formerly Shenzhen Zhongshan Urology Hospital), Shenzhen, 518000, People's Republic of China. shisq2001@126.com.
Jianyong XuShenzhen Key Laboratory of Reproductive Immunology for Peri-Implantation, Shenzhen Zhongshan Institute for Reproduction and Genetics, Shenzhen Zhongshan Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital (Formerly Shenzhen Zhongshan Urology Hospital), Shenzhen, 518000, People's Republic of China. xujianyong820915@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1910-4603

Funding

Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation 2021A1515012484Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation 2023A1515010181
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntrauterine adhesions (IUA) is one of the most common gynecological diseases and main causes of uterine infertility. Among proposed hypotheses on IUA development, the reduced endometrial regeneration resulting from loss of functional stem cells has been proposed as the key factor affecting the IUA prognosis. However, the underlying mechanisms mostly remain unclear. Because the eMSCs (endometrial mesenchymal stem/stromal cells) play a critical role in both supporting the gland development and also preparing the environment for embryo implantation through decidualization, the characteristics and functions were compared between the eMSCs derived from IUA and non-IUA patients, to uncover the important roles of eMSCs in IUA and also the underlying mechanisms.

methodsEndometrium biopsies were collected from IUA patients and controls. The fibrosis features and eMSC distributions were investigated with IHC (immunohistochemistry). Then the eMSCs were isolated and their functions and characteristics were analyzed in vitro.

resultsOur results indicate that the scar tissues in IUA are characterized with hyper-activation of pro-fibrotic fibroblast and myo-differentiation, along with reduced number of eMSCs. The isolated eMSCs from IUA and controls show similar functions from the perspectives of cell morphology, proliferation, colony formation, exosome secretion, positive ratio of eMSC markers and conventional MSC markers, tri-differentiation efficiency, the ability of suppressing lymphocyte proliferation, cell aging, and promoting vascular tube formation. However, the eMSCs from IUA have reduced levels of decidualization and higher levels of cell migration, invasion, and also myofibroblast differentiation. Further investigations indicate that the TGF-β pathway, which is the major inducer of myofibroblast differentiation, is up-regulated and responsible for the enhanced myofibroblast differentiation potential of eMSCs from IUA.

conclusionsIn conclusion, we have demonstrated here that the scar tissues in IUA biopsy are characterized with enhanced differentiation of pro-fibrotic fibroblast and myofibroblast. The number of eMSCs is reduced in IUA tissues, and their myofibroblast differentiation capability is increased.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationMesenchymal Stem CellsMyofibroblastsAdultCell ProliferationCells, CulturedEndometriumFemaleHumansTissue AdhesionsEndometrial mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (eMSCs)Intrauterine adhesionsIUAMyofibroblast differentiation

Identifiers

PMID39901307
PMCPMC11792338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.