Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39901297›Full record

ArticleAnimal microbiome2025

Characterization of microbiota signatures in Iberian pig strains using machine learning algorithms.

Lamiae Azouggagh, Noelia Ibáñez-Escriche, Marina Martínez-Álvaro, Luis Varona, Joaquim Casellas, Sara Negro, Cristina Casto-Rebollo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal microbiome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lamiae AzouggaghInstitute for Animal Science and Technology, Universitat Politècnica de Valencia, Valencia, 46022, Spain.
Noelia Ibáñez-EscricheInstitute for Animal Science and Technology, Universitat Politècnica de Valencia, Valencia, 46022, Spain. noeibes@dca.upv.es.
Marina Martínez-ÁlvaroInstitute for Animal Science and Technology, Universitat Politècnica de Valencia, Valencia, 46022, Spain.
Luis VaronaInstituto Agroalimentario de Aragón (IA2), Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, 50013, Spain.
Joaquim CasellasDepartament de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Barcelona, 08193, Spain.
Sara NegroInga Food, Almendralejo, 06200, Spain.
Cristina Casto-RebolloInstitute for Animal Science and Technology, Universitat Politècnica de Valencia, Valencia, 46022, Spain.

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación PID2020-114705RB-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a growing interest in uncovering the factors that shape microbiome composition due to its association with complex phenotypic traits in livestock. Host genetic variation is increasingly recognized as a major factor influencing the microbiome. The Iberian pig breed, known for its high-quality meat products, includes various strains with recognized genetic and phenotypic variability. However, despite the microbiome's known impact on pigs' productive phenotypes such as meat quality traits, comparative analyses of gut microbial composition across Iberian pig strains are lacking. This study aims to explore the gut microbiota of two Iberian pig strains, Entrepelado (n = 74) and Retinto (n = 63), and their reciprocal crosses (n = 100), using machine learning (ML) models to identify key microbial taxa relevant for distinguishing their genetic backgrounds, which holds potential application in the pig industry. Nine ML algorithms, including tree-based, kernel-based, probabilistic, and linear algorithms, were used.

resultsBeta diversity analysis on 16 S rRNA microbiome data revealed compositional divergence among genetic, age and batch groups. ML models exploring maternal, paternal and heterosis effects showed varying levels of classification performance, with the paternal effect scenario being the best, achieving a mean Area Under the ROC curve (AUROC) of 0.74 using the Catboost (CB) algorithm. However, the most genetically distant animals, the purebreds, were more easily discriminated using the ML models. The classification of the two Iberian strains reached the highest mean AUROC of 0.83 using Support Vector Machine (SVM) model. The most relevant genera in this classification performance were Acetitomaculum, Butyricicoccus and Limosilactobacillus. All of which exhibited a relevant differential abundance between purebred animals using a Bayesian linear model.

conclusionsThe study confirms variations in gut microbiota among Iberian pig strains and their crosses, influenced by genetic and non-genetic factors. ML models, particularly CB and RF, as well as SVM in certain scenarios, combined with a feature selection process, effectively classified genetic groups based on microbiome data and identified key microbial taxa. These taxa were linked to short-chain fatty acids production and lipid metabolism, suggesting microbial composition differences may contribute to variations in fat-related traits among Iberian genetic groups.

Indexed as

16S rRNAClassificationDifferential abundanceIberian pigMachine learningMicrobiome

Identifiers

PMID39901297
PMCPMC11789298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.