Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39901271›Full record

ReviewTrials2025

Enhancing vaccine clinical trials participation among elderly: challenges and strategies.

Paul Gillard, Samer Nakhle, Darin Brimhall, Ouzama Henry, Narcisa Mesaros

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paul GillardPPD Clinical Research Business of Thermo Fisher Scientific, Sint-Stevens-Woluwe, 1932, Belgium. paul.gillard@thermofisher.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2841-0170
Samer NakhlePalm Medical Group, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
Darin BrimhallPPD Clinical Research Business of Thermo Fisher Scientific, Sint-Stevens-Woluwe, 1932, Belgium.
Ouzama Henry, Dynavax, Emeryville, California, USA.
Narcisa MesarosPPD Clinical Research Business of Thermo Fisher Scientific, Sint-Stevens-Woluwe, 1932, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the fastest growing demographic worldwide, the elderly population is projected to reach nearly 1 billion by 2030 and double the 2022 number by 2050. Despite being the largest consumers of medications, they have been historically underrepresented in clinical trials. However, we are witnessing a promising shift as their participation in trials is on the rise. In fact, recent megatrials enrolling more than 30,000 elderly participants demonstrated the feasibility of large-scale clinical trials involving this very specific population. However, unique challenges, including multi-morbidities, frailty, and ethically sound informed consent in those with cognitive deficits, require continuous careful reassessments and flexibility. Creative and tailored strategies are of paramount importance to bolster elderly trial participation. This paper highlights challenges and shares our experiences on novel methods and success stories associated with the enrollment and retention of elderly individuals in clinical trials. Successful tactics to balance the burden of clinical trial participation with its benefits encompass regular contact, family and friends' engagement, making travel easier or unnecessary, use of digital tools, and building relationships with community organizations. Through innovative strategies that consider the unique needs and limitations of this population, we can achieve successful participation in clinical trials. This will lead to more effective treatments and interventions for our growing elderly population.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicPatient ParticipationPatient SelectionResearch SubjectsVaccinesAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsHumansInformed ConsentVaccines

Identifiers

PMID39901271
PMCPMC11792692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.