ArticleStem cell research & therapy2025
Intranasal delivery of hMSC-derived supernatant for treatment of ischemic stroke by inhibiting the pro-inflammatory polarization of neutrophils.
Article in Stem cell research & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Lysate Sustained-Release Nano-Hydrogel Alleviates Spinal Cord Injury by Inhibiting Ferroptosis and Mitochondrial Intrinsic Apoptosis.International dental journal · 2026Article
- Review
- The Therapeutic Potential of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Post-Stroke Depression.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Dynamic regulation and targeted intervention of neutrophils in hepatic ischemia‑reperfusion injury (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Potential of intranasal delivery of human mesenchymal stem cells and extracellular vesicles for stroke therapy.Acta biomaterialia · 2026Review
- Mesenchymal stem cells and secretome as modulators of neuroinflammation in neurological disorders.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Stem cell therapy for stroke: mechanisms, clinical translation, and future perspectives.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2026Review
- Nanoparticle-Mediated Nose-to-Brain Delivery for Ischemic Stroke Therapy: Preclinical Insights.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Stem Cell Therapy Approaches for Ischemia: Assessing Current Innovations and Future Directions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Intranasal Drug Delivery Technology in the Treatment of Central Nervous System Diseases: Challenges, Advances, and Future Research Directions.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStem cells utilized for ischemic stroke treatment often display unstable homing capabilities and diminished activity in vivo, limiting their neuroprotective efficacy. Furthermore, the optimal delivery route for stem cells remains undetermined. While the cytokines secreted by stem cells show promise in modulating post-stroke inflammation, the direct application of these supernatants in ischemic stroke treatment and the underlying mechanisms are still unclear.
methodsSecretory supernatants (hMSC-L) and cell lysate products (hMSC-M) from primary human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells-cultured medium were administered intranasally to mice with cerebral ischemia. The neuroprotective effects of hMSC-L and hMSC-M were assessed with TTC staining, behavioral tests and pathological staining. Flow cytometry and qPCR evaluated the expression of immune cells and cytokines in the CNS and peripheral immune organs. In vitro, flow cytometry and ELISA measured the effects of hMSC-L and hMSC-M on N2 polarization and inflammatory cytokines expression in primary murine neutrophils. Western blot analysis determined the impact of hMSC-L and hMSC-M on the PPAR-γ/STAT6/SOCS1 pathway, which is crucial for N2 neutrophil polarization.
resultsTTC staining, behavioral experiments, and pathological assessments reveal intranasal delivery of hMSC-L and hMSC-M significantly reduces the infarct volume of mice with cerebral ischemia, improves neurological function scores, and promotes motor function recovery. Higher concentrations of hMSC-M contributed a more pronounced effect on neuropathological improvements in ischemic mice. Intranasal delivery of hMSC-L and hMSC-M significantly reduces neutrophil infiltration in the brain post-stroke and increases the proportion of anti-inflammatory N2-subtype neutrophils, boosting the expression levels of IL-10 and TGF-β. In vitro experiments demonstrate that hMSC-L and hMSC-M promote nuclear translocation of PPAR-γ in neutrophils stimulated with PMA, activating the downstream STAT6/SOCS1 signaling pathway to encourage N2-subtype neutrophil polarization.
conclusionsIntranasal delivery of hMSC-L and hMSC-M effectively ameliorates cerebral ischemic injury in mice, comparable to traditional administration routes like intravenous delivery. Treatment with hMSC-L and hMSC-M enhances the PPAR-γ/STAT6/SOCS1 pathway and improves the neuroinflammatory response post-stroke by increasing N2 neutrophil infiltration. These results provide a theoretical basis for a deeper understanding of the mechanisms of stem cell therapy and for exploring suitable delivery pathways of stem cell treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.