Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39901179›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Insights into simulation-based learning: student and faculty experiences in a PharmD program in Saudi Arabia.

Reem Binsuwaidan, Najla A Altwaijry, Alnada A Ibrahim, Rawan A Alghamdi, Razan Bin Humaid, Alaa A AlSharif, Alaa A AlHubaishi, Elshaymaa I Elmongy, Lina I Alnajjar, Ghadah H Alshehri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Reem BinsuwaidanDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, PO Box 84428, Riyadh, 11671, Saudi Arabia.
Najla A AltwaijryDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, PO Box 84428, Riyadh, 11671, Saudi Arabia.
Alnada A IbrahimDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, PO Box 84428, Riyadh, 11671, Saudi Arabia.
Rawan A AlghamdiCollege of Pharmacy, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, PO Box 84428, Riyadh, 11671, Saudi Arabia.
Razan Bin HumaidCollege of Pharmacy, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, PO Box 84428, Riyadh, 11671, Saudi Arabia.
Alaa A AlSharifDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, PO Box 84428, Riyadh, 11671, Saudi Arabia.
Alaa A AlHubaishiDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, PO Box 84428, Riyadh, 11671, Saudi Arabia.
Elshaymaa I ElmongyDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Helwan University, Ain Helwan, Cairo, Egypt.
Lina I AlnajjarDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, PO Box 84428, Riyadh, 11671, Saudi Arabia.
Ghadah H AlshehriDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, PO Box 84428, Riyadh, 11671, Saudi Arabia. ghALShehri@pnu.edu.sa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7807-4470

Funding

Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University PNURSP2024R304
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSimulation-based learning is a highly effective and increasingly popular method of teaching in medical education. The study aimed to evaluate student satisfaction and perceived learning outcome acquisition and to explore faculty perceptions of simulation-based learning.

methodsA mixed-method approach was employed, which used a cross-sectional survey and focus group discussion that solicited feedback from pharmacy students and academic faculty staff, respectively, about their experiences using simulation-based learning. This study gathered data on three simulation activity formats: computerized, mannequin, and standardized patient role-play simulations. The sample size was calculated with a 5% margin of error, 95% confidence interval for a target population.

resultsA total of 295 students, including interns, participated in the surveys, which yielded 757 responses from the students collected following simulation-based learning activities, and 43 responses from the interns, with a response rate ranging from 71 to 93%. Student responses to computerized simulations were positive for perceived learning outcome acquisition (4.16 ± 0.844), preparedness (4.14 ± 0.892), and general perception (4.11 ± 0.951). Additionally, students reported positive perceived learning outcome acquisition (4.44 ± 0.680), preparedness (4.40 ± 0.717), and general perception (4.46 ± 0.676) for standardized patient role-play. After the mannequin simulation, students reported positive perceived learning outcome acquisition (4.62 ± 0.539), preparedness (4.65 ± 0.576), and general perception (4.65 ± 0.608). The average scores calculated for the intern surveys were positive across the same domains: perceived learning outcome acquisition (4.29 ± 0.584), preparedness (4.11 ± 0.239), and general perception (4.18 ± 0.742). The focus group findings identified expensive tools and limited time and resources as the main challenges associated with simulation-based learning.

conclusionsPharmacy students and interns generally indicated positive attitudes toward all simulation activities. Faculty considered simulation to be a significant teaching tool that enhances information retention and sharpens students' skills. The study identified future targets of and main challenges to improving the integration of simulation in pharmacy education.

Indexed as

Education, Pharmacy, GraduateSimulation TrainingStudents, PharmacyAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleManikinsProblem-Based LearningSaudi ArabiaSurveys and QuestionnairesPharmacy educationPharm D programSaudi ArabiaSimulation-based learningStudent perceptions

Identifiers

PMID39901179
PMCPMC11789292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.