Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39901161›Full record

SynthesisBMC surgery2025

Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency after pancreatic resection: a systematic review.

Marcello Di Martino, Ángela de la Hoz Rodriguez, Andrea Saibanti, Guillermo Salvador Camarmo, Nico Pagano, Elena Martín-Pérez, Matteo Donadon

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Determinants of hyperinsulinism severity in children with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency.EClinicalMedicine · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marcello Di MartinoDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, 28100, Italy. marcello.dimartino@uniupo.it.
Ángela de la Hoz RodriguezDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-IP), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain.
Andrea SaibantiDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, 28100, Italy.
Guillermo Salvador CamarmoDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-IP), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain.
Nico PaganoDivision of Gastroenterology, University Maggiore Hospital della Carità, Novara, 28100, Italy.
Elena Martín-PérezDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-IP), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain.
Matteo DonadonDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, 28100, Italy. matteo.donadon@uniupo.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) is a condition defined by a reduction in pancreatic exocrine activity that impairs normal digestion. Despite established guidelines recommendations, precise diagnosis of PEI after pancreatic resection are infrequently achieved. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the methodology and accuracy of diagnostic tools available for evaluating PEI after pancreatic resection.

methodsA review of PEI diagnostic tests was conducted using a combined text and MeSH search strategy to identify relevant articles focused on post-pancreatectomy PEI diagnosis.

resultsThe literature search yielded 4,874 records, and 30 studies were included in the analysis, with a total of 2,305 patients. The reported frequency of PEI across the included studies varied widely, though more than two-thirds of included papers reported an incidence of PEI above 65% in patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy. The faecal elastase-1 (FE-1) test was the most frequently used test for diagnosing post-pancreatectomy PEI. Six studies compared the diagnostic accuracy of FE-1 with faecal fat tests or 13 C breath tests, finding no significant differences. Five studies reported on micronutrient deficiencies.

conclusionThe FE-1 test is the most commonly used diagnostic tool for post-pancreatectomy PEI; however, well-designed studies comparing the diagnostic accuracy of various tests for PEI are lacking. Additionally, few studies report on micronutrient deficiencies, variations in anthropometric data or PEI-related patient-reported outcomes. Future studies should aim to establish a gold standard for diagnosis and severity assessment of post-pancreatectomy PEI and provide guidance for tailored pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy.

Indexed as

Exocrine Pancreatic InsufficiencyPancreatectomyPostoperative ComplicationsFecesHumansPancreatic ElastasePancreatic ElastaseDistal pancreatectomyPancreatectomyPancreatic enzymePancreatic insufficiencyPancreatic replacement therapyPancreatoduodenectomyPERT

Identifiers

PMID39901161
PMCPMC11789297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.