ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2025
Presence of coronary artery disease in adults with newly detected diabetes mellitus.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiparametric Coronary CT Angiography-Derived Imaging Biomarkers for Risk Stratification in Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease: Incremental Prognostic Value in Patients with Diabetes.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026Article
- A Flexible Wearable Glucose Sensor for Noninvasive Diabetes Screening: Functional Equivalence and Model Interpretability.Biosensors · 2026Article
- A case-control study of the interaction of the eNOS gene polymorphisms rs1799983 and rs1800780 with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) risk factors.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe aimed to analyze the presence and extent of coronary artery disease in patients with newly detected diabetes mellitus.
methodsClinical health examinations of asymptomatic community-dwelling adults between 2008 and 2018 at a medical center in Taiwan were reviewed. Coronary computed tomography angiography was performed in 444 participants, of which 338, 54, and 52 were categorized as 'without diabetes mellitus', 'newly detected diabetes mellitus', and 'known diabetes mellitus', respectively.
resultsPrevalence of significant coronary artery disease (≥ 50% stenosis) was higher in participants with newly detected diabetes mellitus than in participants without diabetes mellitus (40.7% vs. 20.1%, p < 0.0001). Among those with coronary artery stenosis, the number of coronary vessels with significant obstruction (0.72 vs. 0.42, p = 0.0147) was also higher in participants with newly detected diabetes mellitus. Using multiple logistic regression analysis, new detection of diabetes mellitus was identified as an independent risk factor for significant coronary artery disease (odds ratio: 2.153, 95% confidence interval: 1.112-4.166).
conclusionAsymptomatic patients with newly detected diabetes mellitus had higher prevalence and greater extent of coronary artery disease than those without diabetes mellitus. More attention should thus be paid to the assessment of coronary artery disease in patients with newly detected diabetes mellitus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.