ArticleBMC women's health2025
Pathological and radiological assessment of benign breast lesions with BIRADS IVc/V subtypes. should we repeat the biopsy?
Article in BMC women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Radiologic-Pathologic Discordance After Image-Guided Breast Biopsy: A Systematic Review of Prevalence and Outcomes.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- Magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer management: current applications, limitations, and future directions.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2026Review
- The Importance of Surgeon-Performed Point-of-Care Breast Sonography in the Management of Complex Breast Tumors.Maedica · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTimely diagnosis is a crucial factor in decreasing the death rate of patients with breast cancer. BI-RADS categories IVc and V indicate a strong suspicion of cancer. The categorisation of each group is determined by the characteristics of the lesion. Certain benign breast lesions might have radiological features indicative of malignancy; thus, biopsy is mandatory. This study aimed to identify the histopathological diagnosis of benign breast masses classified into BIRADS IVc and V subgroups, investigate the radiological characteristics of these masses, and identify ultrasound features that could lead to false positive results (benign lesions that mimic malignancy on imaging).
methodsThis was a retrospective cross-sectional study at a single facility. Breast lesions reported as BIRADS IVc and V that underwent needle core/stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy were reviewed. Patients with benign pathologic diagnoses were analysed, delineating pathological diagnoses. Radiological descriptors were compared to those of a matched control of 50 malignant cases with BIRADS IVc.
resultsA total of 828 breast lesions classified as BIRADS IVc or V were detected during the period spanning from 2015 to 2022. Forty-four lesions (44/828, 5.3%) were benign at initial biopsy, while 784 lesions (784/828, 94.7%) were malignant. After histopathological testing and repeat biopsy, 26/828 (3.14%) patients had discordant benign diagnosis. Half of the repeated biopsies (10/20, 50%) showed malignant pathology. Compared to that in the control group, the presence of an oval shape of the mass was significantly more common in patients with benign pathology (p = 0.035). Conversely, the presence of posterior shadowing was significantly less common (p = 0.050) in benign lesions. No significant differences were observed for the other radiological characteristics. The most common histopathological diagnosis was fibrocystic change.
conclusionThis study highlights key findings regarding the sonographic imaging descriptors and histopathological diagnoses of benign breast lesions categorised as BIRADS IVc/V. The study recommends a correlation between clinical and radiological findings and encourages multidisciplinary decision-making among radiologists, pathologists, and clinicians to determine if a repeat biopsy is warranted. There is a need for continuous research to improve the diagnosis and treatment of breast lesions and reduce false-positive rates by incorporating other methodologies such as sonoelastography and incorporating deep learning and artificial intelligence in the decision-making to eliminate unnecessary procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.