SynthesisBMC cancer2025
Enhancing cancer care through a knowledge-sharing model: a systematic review of Project ECHO
Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCancer poses a life-threatening public health challenge, particularly impacting low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This study focuses on India, where the cancer burden is substantial, with approximately 1.2 million new cancer cases recorded in 2020, emphasising the urgent need for effective prevention, early detection, treatment, and support services. The lack of local workforce capacity in rural areas exacerbates this challenge, necessitating collaborative efforts. The nonprofit organization Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) employs the 'Hub and Spoke' model in India to bridge gaps in cancer care. The review aimed to assess the scale and impact of ECHO's initiatives, evaluate findings, examine the model's implementation, and assess its acceptability among healthcare professionals (HCPs) in preventing and treating cancer.
methodThis systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Eight studies, comprising six quasi-experimental and two observational studies, employing the ECHO Model for cancer care training programmes were identified. The quality of the selected articles was assessed using a standardized critical appraisal tool developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI).
resultsThe findings reveal that ECHO India actively collaborates with experts and institutions, conducting programmes and webinars in 12 states/Union Territories to enhance professionals' expertise in cancer care. Published literature, though limited, emphasises ECHO's training impact, with knowledge gains ranging from 7% to 51%. The model's adoption, retention, and reach are evident through 24 institutes/hubs implementing ECHO programmes in oncology. However, challenges such as low pre post assessment response rate and internet connectivity were observed.
conclusionECHO India's work in cancer care is substantial, addressing gaps in workforce capacity. The systematic review highlights the need for more publications to capture ECHO's impact comprehensively. The findings contribute valuable insights to ongoing efforts to reduce India's cancer burden and improve the well-being of its population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.