ArticleCell death and differentiation2025
Deciphering molecular specificity in MCL-1/BAK interaction and its implications for designing potent MCL-1 inhibitors.
Article in Cell death and differentiation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mitochondrial apoptosis gene-based pathomics for ovarian cancer prognosis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- From venom peptides to neurotherapeutics: BmK defensins and short-chain peptides as modulators of ion channels.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- A Fragment-Based Electrophile-First Approach to Target Histidine with Aryl-Fluorosulfates: Application to hMcl-1.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2025Article
- Targeting the BCL2 Family: Advances and Challenges in BH3 Mimetic-Based Therapies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Targeting mitochondrial dysfunction to intervene in liver cancer.Cancer biology & medicine · 2025Review
- CYP51A1 in health and disease: from sterol metabolism to regulated cell death.Cell death discovery · 2025Review
- Structural basis of BAK sequestration by MCL-1 in apoptosis.Molecular cell · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The intricate interplay among BCL-2 family proteins governs mitochondrial apoptosis, with the anti-apoptotic protein MCL-1 primarily exerting its function by sequestering the pore-forming effector BAK. Understanding the MCL-1/BAK complex is pivotal for the sensitivity of cancer cells to BH3 mimetics, yet the precise molecular mechanism underlying their interaction remains elusive. Herein, we demonstrate that a canonical BH3 peptide from BAK inadequately binds to MCL-1 proteins, whereas an extended BAK-BH3 peptide with five C-terminal residues exhibits a remarkable 65-fold increase in affinity. By elucidating the complex structures of MCL-1 bound to these two BAK-BH3 peptides at 2.08 Å and 1.98 Å resolutions, we uncover their distinct binding specificities. Notably, MCL-1 engages in critical hydrophobic interactions with the extended BAK-BH3 peptide, particularly at an additional p5 sub-pocket, featuring a π-π stacking interaction between MCL-1 Phe319 and BAK Tyr89. Mutations within this p5 sub-pocket substantially disrupt the MCL-1/BAK protein-protein interaction. Furthermore, the p5 sub-pocket of MCL-1 significantly influences the efficacy of MCL-1 inhibitors. Overall, our findings elucidate the molecular specificity underlying MCL-1 binding to BAK and underscore the significance of the p5 hydrophobic sub-pocket in their high-affinity interaction, thus providing novel insights for the development of BH3 mimetics targeting the MCL-1/BAK interaction as potential therapeutics for cancer treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.