ArticleScientific reports2025
AI-driven video summarization for optimizing content retrieval and management through deep learning techniques.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparing artificial intelligence and healthcare professional performance in surgical and interventional video analysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Septic Shock in Hematological Malignancies: Role of Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Outcomes.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence Generated Videos as Supportive Tools in Medical Education: A Scoping Review.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence, questions are increasingly being raised by stakeholders regarding how such technologies can enhance the environmental, social, and governance outcomes of organizations. In this study, challenges related to the organization and retrieval of video content within large, heterogeneous media archives are addressed. Existing methods, often reliant on human intervention or low-complexity algorithms, are observed to struggle with the growing demands of online video quantity and quality. To address these limitations, a novel approach is proposed, where convolutional neural networks and long short-term memory networks are utilized to extract both frame-level and temporal video features. Residual networks 50 (ResNet50) is integrated for enhanced content representation, and two-frame video flow is employed to improve system performance. The framework achieves precision, recall, and F-score of 79.2%, 86.5%, and 83%, respectively, on the YouTube, EPFL, and TVSum datasets. Beyond technological advancements, opportunities for effective content management are highlighted, emphasizing the promotion of sustainable digital practices. By minimizing data duplication and optimizing resource usage, scalable solutions for large media collections are supported by the proposed system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.