Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39900958›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Efficacy of 3D-printed patient specific implant for orbital wall fracture repair in a series of 40 patients.

Min Kyu Yang, Seong Jung Ha, Gye Jung Kim, Junhyeok Ock, Namkug Kim, Ho-Seok Sa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Bioprinting for craniofacial reconstruction: A review of advancements, clinical use, and challenges.Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Min Kyu YangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seong Jung HaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Gye Jung KimDepartment of Ophthalmology, Myongji Hospital, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Junhyeok OckDepartment of Convergence Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Asan Medical Institute of Convergence Science and Technology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Namkug KimDepartment of Convergence Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Asan Medical Institute of Convergence Science and Technology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ho-Seok SaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. lineblue@hanmail.net.ORCID 0000-0003-3043-7222

Funding

Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center 2020IT0013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a 3D-printed patient specific implant (PSI) made of polycaprolactone (PCL) in repairing orbital wall fractures. We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent surgical repair for unilateral orbital wall fractures using a 3D-printed PCL PSI. Computed tomography scans were used to compare the orbital tissue volumes and the morphological similarity (root-mean-square [RMS] conformance distance) between the fractured wall and the mirrored counterpart before and after surgery. All orbital fractures (inferior wall, 19; medial wall, 9; and combined inferior and medial walls, 12) were successfully repaired without postoperative complications. The mean time for implant insertion during surgery was 19.8 s (range, 3-60). The mean orbital tissue volume ratio between the fractured orbit and the contralateral normal orbit significantly decreased after surgery (109.0% preoperatively vs. 100.6% at postoperative 6 months, P < 0.001, paired t-test). The median RMS conformance distance significantly decreased after surgery (3.426 mm preoperatively vs. 1.073 mm at postoperative 6 months, P < 0.001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Our findings suggest that using a 3D-printed PCL PSI could effectively restore the original volume and shape of the orbit, thus being a valuable addition to the surgeon's armamentarium for managing orbital wall fractures.

Indexed as

Orbital FracturesPrinting, Three-DimensionalProstheses and ImplantsAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolyestersRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultpolycaprolactonePolyesters3D-printedCustomisedImplantOrbital wall fracture

Identifiers

PMID39900958
PMCPMC11791147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.