ArticleScientific reports2025
Using computer modeling to find new LRRK2 inhibitors for parkinson's disease.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a complex neurodegenerative disorder that affects multiple neurotransmitters, and its exact cause is still unknown. Developing new drugs for PD is a lengthy and expensive process, making it difficult to find new treatments. This study aims to create a detailed dataset to build strong predictive models with various machine learning algorithms. An ensemble modeling approach was employed to screen the DrugBank database, aiming to repurpose approved medications as potential treatments for Parkinson's disease (PD). The dataset was constructed using pIC50 values of various compounds targeting the inhibition of leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2). The best ensemble model showed exceptional predictive performance, with five-fold cross-validation and external validation metrics exceeding 0.8 (Q
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.