ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2025
Next generation sequencing: a possible answer to sudden unexplained deaths in a young South African cohort?
Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Molecular mechanisms of sudden unexplained death and recent updates on molecular autopsy strategies for forensic investigation.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a major public health concern. In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), including South Africa, there is a lack of reliable statistics on the incidence of SCD, even though there has been a fourfold increase in noncommunicable diseases (NCD), particularly cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Sudden cardiac death contributes to an estimated 50% of all cardiovascular deaths, which highlights South Africa's need for research into better detection, treatment and prevention. This study aimed to identify an inherited cardiac arrhythmogenic disorder, linked to variants in cardiomyopathy- and arrhythmia-related genes, as a potential contributing factor to sudden cardiac deaths. DNA was extracted from blood samples collected at autopsy of 51 sudden unexpected death (SUD) cases, and subjected to next-generation sequencing (NGS) of 49 genes linked to inherited cardiac arrhythmogenic disorders. Variants were annotated and interpretated for clinical significance using the Galaxy bioinformatic platform. In total, 175 different missense variants were identified in the study population (n = 51). Of these, 92.5% (162/175) were known, documented variants, and the remaining 7.4% (13/175) were considered novel. Of the known variants, 78.4% (127/162) were of benign/likely benign significance, 20.4% (33/162) were variants of unknown significance (VUS), and 1.2% (2/162) was pathogenic. The 13 novel variants were analysed using online prediction software, with 92.3% (12/13) predicted to be likely benign and 7.7% (1/13) grouped into the VUS category. Post-mortem genetic testing provided evidence of a genetic arrhythmic/cardiac conduction disorder as the probable pathogenic basis for approximately 4% (2/51) of sudden unexpected death (SUD) cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.