ArticleThe AAPS journal2025
A Highly Sensitive Immunoassay to Enable Quantification of a Nanobody-Based Imaging Agent in Human Serum.
Article in The AAPS journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immuno-positron emission tomography (i-PET) is a non-invasive imaging technique that combines the specificity of monoclonal antibodies with the sensitivity of positron emission tomography to visualize and quantify the distribution of target antigens in vivo, providing detailed spatial information about the presence and localization of specific biomarkers. Due to the crucial role that cytotoxic T cells play in antitumor responses, a new tracer consisting of a humanized anti-CD8 nanobody labeled with fluorine-18 was developed to inform immuno-oncology treatments and support medical decision-making. Nanobodies are single-domain antibodies with low molecular weight and fast peripheral blood clearance, both of which are advantageous properties for same-day imaging. However, these unique characteristics pose bioanalytical challenges when developing clinical pharmacokinetic (PK) assays, including the need for high assay sensitivity. This manuscript focuses on overcoming bioanalytical challenges related to sensitivity and matrix interference during the development of a method to quantify this novel anti-CD8 nanobody tracer in human serum. Out of the three immunoassay platforms evaluated (ELISA, SMCxPRO™ and Gyrolab®), a Gyrolab method was ultimately selected due to its superior sensitivity, equal detectability of both conjugated and unconjugated forms of the nanobody and its ability to minimize matrix interference. By selecting the right assay format, along with the appropriate critical reagents for capture and detection, matrix interference was diminished. This novel PK method was successfully qualified demonstrating acceptable performance across all parameters. The acquired bioanalytical insights gained could be applied to nanobody-derived conjugates or other modalities that require high sensitivity in the clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39900849What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.