Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39900793›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Object identity representation occurs early in the archerfish visual system.

Svetlana Volotsky, Ronen Segev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The visual challenges of short-range navigation in teleost fish.The Journal of experimental biology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Svetlana VolotskyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba, 8410501, Israel.
Ronen SegevDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba, 8410501, Israel. ronensgv@bgu.ac.il.

Funding

Human Frontier Science Program RGP0016/2019Israel Science Foundation 824/21
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Archerfish hunt by shooting a jet of water at aerial targets, a behavior used to study their visual processing by presenting a set of images on a screen above the water tank and observing the behavioral response. Building on this unique behavior, it was recently shown that archerfish can be trained to distinguish between different object categories by generalizing from examples. Analysis of the archerfish's behavior revealed that the fish visual system relies on a small set of visual features for categorization and is more sensitive to object contours than to textures. To understand the neural basis of this object recognition, we investigated the neural representation of features and objects in the archerfish optic tectum using recording of single cells. We found that, although the optic tectum is an early stage of visual processing, a small population of neurons in this region contains information about the object category. This contrasts with the primate visual system, where the representation of objects emerges only at later stages of visual processing. These results suggest that early-stage feature extraction and object categorization in archerfish might represent a form of specialized visual processing. This contributes to a broader understanding of visual processing across taxa.

Indexed as

FishesPattern Recognition, VisualSuperior ColliculiVisual PathwaysVisual PerceptionAnimalsBehavior, AnimalNeuronsPhotic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID39900793
PMCPMC11790826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.