Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39900768›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025

A Machine Learning Pipeline to Screen Large In Vivo Molecular Data to Curate Disease Signatures of High Translational Potential.

Swapna Kannan, Rasha Hammamieh, Nabarun Chakraborty

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Swapna KannanMedical Readiness Systems Biology, CMPN, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Rasha HammamiehMedical Readiness Systems Biology, CMPN, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Nabarun ChakrabortyMedical Readiness Systems Biology, CMPN, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD, USA. Nabarun.Chakraborty2.civ@health.mil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A significantly low success rate of human clinical studies has long been attributed to a capability gap, namely, an ineffective translation of the animal data to the human context. To bridge this capability gap, several correcting measures have been evaluated; using a strict guideline to select animal models for a given disease and implementing alternative models such as tissues-on-chip are some of them. Current hypothesis tells that there is a basic similarity in responding to a stress between human and those mammals that precede human in the phylogenetic tree; however, the corresponding molecular mechanisms are not exactly the same across these species. Therefore, strategic manipulations are necessary to curate those candidates from animal data that would have high translational potential. Hence, we developed an analytical tool that can screen the in vivo results, such as genomic, proteomic, epigenomic data with two primary objectives. The first objective is to identify those molecules that are sequentially conserved across the phylogenetic tree. The second objective is to find those molecules that would similarly perturb across the phylogenetic tree in responding to a stress of interest. A machine learning (ML) algorithm converges these two sets of molecules to curate the common features, which would demonstrate phylogenetic homology in their molecular makeups and characteristic similarity across the phylogenetic tree. This ML-pipeline would be most beneficial in those scenarios, such as the rare diseases or chemical-biological-radiation-nuclear (CBRN)-exposed samples, where the inventory of human samples is minimum. This strategy is surely at a risk in overlooking the human-exclusive signatures; nevertheless, this ML-approach is poised to refine the animal data to generate results of high translational potential with minimum false positive and false negative entries.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyMachine LearningTranslational Research, BiomedicalAlgorithmsAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalGenomicsHumansPhylogenyProteomicsBig data managementData refinementDisease agnostic approachIn silico modelMachine learningPhylogenetically conserved biomarker

Identifiers

PMID39900768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.