ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025
A Machine Learning Pipeline to Screen Large In Vivo Molecular Data to Curate Disease Signatures of High Translational Potential.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A significantly low success rate of human clinical studies has long been attributed to a capability gap, namely, an ineffective translation of the animal data to the human context. To bridge this capability gap, several correcting measures have been evaluated; using a strict guideline to select animal models for a given disease and implementing alternative models such as tissues-on-chip are some of them. Current hypothesis tells that there is a basic similarity in responding to a stress between human and those mammals that precede human in the phylogenetic tree; however, the corresponding molecular mechanisms are not exactly the same across these species. Therefore, strategic manipulations are necessary to curate those candidates from animal data that would have high translational potential. Hence, we developed an analytical tool that can screen the in vivo results, such as genomic, proteomic, epigenomic data with two primary objectives. The first objective is to identify those molecules that are sequentially conserved across the phylogenetic tree. The second objective is to find those molecules that would similarly perturb across the phylogenetic tree in responding to a stress of interest. A machine learning (ML) algorithm converges these two sets of molecules to curate the common features, which would demonstrate phylogenetic homology in their molecular makeups and characteristic similarity across the phylogenetic tree. This ML-pipeline would be most beneficial in those scenarios, such as the rare diseases or chemical-biological-radiation-nuclear (CBRN)-exposed samples, where the inventory of human samples is minimum. This strategy is surely at a risk in overlooking the human-exclusive signatures; nevertheless, this ML-approach is poised to refine the animal data to generate results of high translational potential with minimum false positive and false negative entries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39900768What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.