Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39900766›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025

Deconvolving Bulk Transcriptomics Samples to Obtain Cell Type Proportion Estimates.

Vilas Menon

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Transcriptomics in the Study of Bone and Cartilage.Current osteoporosis reports · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Vilas MenonDepartment of Neurology, Center for Translational and Computational Neuroimmunology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. vm2545@cumc.columbia.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The brain, like many organs in the body, comprises an array of different cell types that act in concert to achieve its many functions. These cell types vary dramatically in molecular composition, morphology, spatial distribution, electrical activity, signaling, and association with sensory processing and behavior. As a result, a comprehensive investigation of molecular alterations in disease or perturbation studies needs to account for cell type heterogeneity in the brain. Bulk profiling of tissue is widely used in neuroscience, and is now a relatively mature field, with a range of experimental, technical, and computational approaches that are broadly and consistently used. One major question in bulk profiling, however, is the contribution of individual cell types to the overall bulk signature. Recently, advances in scale and sensitivity of single-cell methods have provided cell type-specific signatures in health and disease, offering a solution to the problem of inferring cell type contributions to bulk signatures. This is the main goal of bulk deconvolution, which aims to deconvolve cell type-specific signatures and proportions from bulk data, either de novo or using reference profiles obtained from single-cell data. Here, we present an overview of some basic principles of deconvolution, followed by a general workflow on applying deconvolution methods to bulk RNA-seq data in order to assess compositional differences in individual cell types that may be associated with experimental variable of interests.

Indexed as

BrainComputational BiologyGene Expression ProfilingSingle-Cell AnalysisTranscriptomeAnimalsHumansBulk RNA-sequencingCell typesDeconvolutionMolecular signaturesSingle-cell RNA sequencing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.