ArticleEndocrine2025
Analysis of prognostic factors and establishment of a recurrence risk prediction model for papillary thyroid carcinoma based on BRAF stratification.
Article in Endocrine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prediction models for postoperative recurrence in papillary thyroid carcinoma: a systematic review and critical appraisal.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPredicting the likelihood of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) recurrence is crucial for improving patient outcomes. The association between the BRAF V600E (BRAF) mutation and PTC recurrence remains controversial. Our goal was to determine prognostic features of PTC patients and construct models for predicting recurrence risk according to BRAF mutation status.
methodsA total of 811 PTC patients whose clinical information and survival data were available were included in this study. Independent prognostic variables of PTC identified by screening via LASSO-Cox regression analysis were then used to construct nomograms. The performance of the predictive models was assessed according to the C-index, ROC curve, validation curve, and decision curve analyses. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to analyze differences between patients grouped according to prognostic factors and relapse risk.
resultsMultivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that extrathyroidal extension (ETE), vascular tumor thrombus, and lymph node yield (LNY) were correlated with recurrence-free survival (RFS) in the BRAF mutation-negative group, while extranodal extension (ENE), number of metastatic lymph node (NMLN), pathological stage, and vascular tumor thrombus were correlated with RFS in the BRAF mutation-positive group. The mutation-stratified predictive models demonstrated better performance than the model without stratification, as indicated by the greater C-index values (0.880 vs. 0.859 vs. 0.753), AUC values (1-year AUC: 0.946 vs. 0.947 vs. 0.758; 3-year AUC: 0.889 vs. 0.871 vs. 0.760; 5-year AUC: 0.845 vs. 0.793 vs. 0.758), and net clinical benefit. The calibration curves at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years showed good consistency. The bootstrap internal validation had good AUC values exceeding 0.8 and showed a well-fitting calibration curve. Significant differences in RFS were observed between the low-risk and high-risk groups (P < 0.001).
conclusionStratifying patients based on their BRAF mutation status can facilitate the development of better and more targeted postoperative management strategies. Nomograms for BRAF mutation positive and negative patients were developed to precisely and consistently predict recurrence risk in PTC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39900746What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.