ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Integrative prognostic modeling of ovarian cancer: incorporating genetic, clinical, and immunological markers.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Constructing a prognostic survival model for patients with stage II-IV epithelial ovarian cancer: a study based on the SEER database and external validation in China.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in ovarian cancer: transforming detection, treatment, and prevention.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Review
- Prognostic Impact of Pre-Treatment Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) on Survival in Patients with Advanced-Stage Ovarian Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ovarian cancer has a high mortality rate, primarily due to late diagnosis and complex pathogenesis. This study develops an integrative prognostic model combining genetic, clinical, and immunological data to predict outcomes in ovarian cancer patients. Utilizing data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), we identified significant prognostic genes through differential expression and survival analysis, integrating these with clinical features and immune landscape assessments including immune cell infiltration and checkpoint expression. The risk score effectively predicted patient survival, distinguishing between high and low-risk groups with significant outcome differences. High-risk patients demonstrated poor prognosis, greater immune checkpoint expression, and higher tumor mutational burdens (TMB), suggesting potential responsiveness to immunotherapy. The model's predictive capacity was validated across multiple cohorts, showing consistent performance in survival prediction and treatment response. Calibration curves and decision curve analysis confirmed the model's clinical utility. This study highlights the potential of an integrated approach to enhance personalized treatment strategies in ovarian cancer, aiming to improve patient management and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.